<!--Copyright 2022 The HuggingFace Team. All rights reserved.

Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at

http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on
an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License.

⚠️ Note that this file is in Markdown but contain specific syntax for our doc-builder (similar to MDX) that may not be
rendered properly in your Markdown viewer.

-->

# MaskFormer

<Tip>

This is a recently introduced model so the API hasn't been tested extensively. There may be some bugs or slight
breaking changes to fix it in the future. If you see something strange, file a [Github Issue](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/issues/new?assignees=&labels=&template=bug-report.md&title).

</Tip>

## Overview

The MaskFormer model was proposed in [Per-Pixel Classification is Not All You Need for Semantic Segmentation](https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.06278) by Bowen Cheng, Alexander G. Schwing, Alexander Kirillov. MaskFormer addresses semantic segmentation with a mask classification paradigm instead of performing classic pixel-level classification.

The abstract from the paper is the following:

*Modern approaches typically formulate semantic segmentation as a per-pixel classification task, while instance-level segmentation is handled with an alternative mask classification. Our key insight: mask classification is sufficiently general to solve both semantic- and instance-level segmentation tasks in a unified manner using the exact same model, loss, and training procedure. Following this observation, we propose MaskFormer, a simple mask classification model which predicts a set of binary masks, each associated with a single global class label prediction. Overall, the proposed mask classification-based method simplifies the landscape of effective approaches to semantic and panoptic segmentation tasks and shows excellent empirical results. In particular, we observe that MaskFormer outperforms per-pixel classification baselines when the number of classes is large. Our mask classification-based method outperforms both current state-of-the-art semantic (55.6 mIoU on ADE20K) and panoptic segmentation (52.7 PQ on COCO) models.*

The figure below illustrates the architecture of MaskFormer. Taken from the [original paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.06278).

<img width="600" src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images/resolve/main/maskformer_architecture.png"/>

This model was contributed by [francesco](https://huggingface.co/francesco). The original code can be found [here](https://github.com/facebookresearch/MaskFormer).

## Usage tips

-  MaskFormer's Transformer decoder is identical to the decoder of [DETR](detr). During training, the authors of DETR did find it helpful to use auxiliary losses in the decoder, especially to help the model output the correct number of objects of each class. If you set the parameter `use_auxiliary_loss` of [`MaskFormerConfig`] to `True`, then prediction feedforward neural networks and Hungarian losses are added after each decoder layer (with the FFNs sharing parameters).
- If you want to train the model in a distributed environment across multiple nodes, then one should update the
  `get_num_masks` function inside in the `MaskFormerLoss` class of `modeling_maskformer.py`. When training on multiple nodes, this should be
  set to the average number of target masks across all nodes, as can be seen in the original implementation [here](https://github.com/facebookresearch/MaskFormer/blob/da3e60d85fdeedcb31476b5edd7d328826ce56cc/mask_former/modeling/criterion.py#L169).
- One can use [`MaskFormerImageProcessor`] to prepare images for the model and optional targets for the model.
- To get the final segmentation, depending on the task, you can call [`~MaskFormerImageProcessor.post_process_semantic_segmentation`] or [`~MaskFormerImageProcessor.post_process_panoptic_segmentation`]. Both tasks can be solved using [`MaskFormerForInstanceSegmentation`] output, panoptic segmentation accepts an optional `label_ids_to_fuse` argument to fuse instances of the target object/s (e.g. sky) together.

## Resources

<PipelineTag pipeline="image-segmentation"/>

- All notebooks that illustrate inference as well as fine-tuning on custom data with MaskFormer can be found [here](https://github.com/NielsRogge/Transformers-Tutorials/tree/master/MaskFormer).

## MaskFormer specific outputs

[[autodoc]] models.maskformer.modeling_maskformer.MaskFormerModelOutput

[[autodoc]] models.maskformer.modeling_maskformer.MaskFormerForInstanceSegmentationOutput

## MaskFormerConfig

[[autodoc]] MaskFormerConfig

## MaskFormerImageProcessor

[[autodoc]] MaskFormerImageProcessor
    - preprocess
    - encode_inputs
    - post_process_semantic_segmentation
    - post_process_instance_segmentation
    - post_process_panoptic_segmentation

## MaskFormerFeatureExtractor

[[autodoc]] MaskFormerFeatureExtractor
    - __call__
    - encode_inputs
    - post_process_semantic_segmentation
    - post_process_instance_segmentation
    - post_process_panoptic_segmentation

## MaskFormerModel

[[autodoc]] MaskFormerModel
    - forward

## MaskFormerForInstanceSegmentation

[[autodoc]] MaskFormerForInstanceSegmentation
    - forward